Proof.
For simplicity, we will give the proof only in the case

, but
the proof works in general. Suppose

and

, and

. We
will first prove that

acts transitively on

. Let

for
some

. Recall that we proved long ago, using the Chinese
Remainder Theorem (Theorem
5.1.4) that there exists

such that

is an integral ideal that is
coprime to

. The product
 |
(9.1) |
is a nonzero integral

ideal since it is a product of nonzero
integral

ideals.
Since

we have that

. Thus the numerator of
the rightmost expression in (
9.2.1) is
divisible by

. Also, because

is coprime
to

, each

is coprime to

as well. Thus

is coprime to

. Thus the
denominator of the rightmost expression in (
9.2.1)
must also be divisibly by

in order to cancel the

in the numerator. Thus we have shown that for any

,
By unique factorization, since every

appears in the left hand
side, we must have that for each

there is a

with

.
Choose some
and suppose that
is another index. Because
acts transitively, there exists
such that
. Applying
to the factorization
, we see that
Taking

on both sides and using unique factorization,
we get

. Thus

.
As was mentioned right before the statement of the theorem, for any
we have
, so by transitivity
.
We have, upon apply CRT and that
, that
which completes the proof.
The rest of this section illustrates the theorem for quadratic fields
and a cubic field and its Galois closure.