In this section, we describe a slightly different method, which only uses Theorem 1.10 and the definition of the derivative.
Thus the rank
is
the limit as
of a certain (smooth) function. We know this
limit is an integer. But, for example, for the rank
curve
Using the definition of derivative, we approximate
as follows. For
small, we have
In fact, we have
We can use this formula in SAGE to
``approximate''
. First we start
with a curve of rank
.
sage: e = EllipticCurve('389a'); e.rank()
2
sage: L = e.Lseries_dokchitser()
sage: def r(e,s): L1=L(s); L2=L(s^2-s+1); return (L2-L1)/((s-1)*L1)
sage: r(e,1.01)
2.00413534247395
sage: r(e,1.001)
2.00043133754756
sage: r(e,1.00001)
2.00000433133371
Next consider the curve
of rank
:
sage: e = EllipticCurve([1, -1, 0, -79, 289])
sage: e.rank()
4
sage: L = e.Lseries_dokchitser(100)
sage: def r(e,s): L1=L(s); L2=L(s^2-s+1); return (L2-L1)/((s-1)*L1)
sage: R = RealField(100)
sage: r(e,R('1.01'))
4.0212949184444018810727106489
sage: r(e,R('1.001'))
4.0022223745190806421850637523
sage: r(e,R('1.00001'))
4.0000223250026401574120263050
sage: r(e,R('1.000001'))
4.0000022325922257758141597819
It certainly looks like
. We know that
, and if only there were a good way to bound
the error we could conclude that the limit is
. But this has
stumped people for years, and probably it is nearly impossible without
a deep result that somehow interprets
in a completely
different way.
William 2007-05-25